Developer fined $ 1.2 million for cramming 29 units into 10 units


The Mohammed Nuru-Public Works scandal has given the FBI, local media, and the San Francisco City Attorney all manner of additional sub-scandals to follow, the latest of which affects a five-year-old apartment complex in the Portola Quartier. . This complex of San Bruno Avenue and Woolsey Streets is licensed to house 10 units, but a Mission Local report in June found the place was teeming with nearly 30 units and security breaches galore.

The Chronicle now reports that the developer of the building has been fined $ 1.2 million for invading the place with illegal units. And there is a link with the Nuru scandal; after charges of check fraud hit former Building Inspection Department (DBI) commission chairman, DBI audited a number of inspectors, found undeclared $ 180,000 loan from a developer to Inspector Bernard Curran, then discovered that Curran had signed the illegal building – a building for which the registered engineer granted the loan of $ 180,000. It might not be “pay to play, and they let you break the law”, but it sure looks that way.

“The owners of these properties tried to cheat to get more profit. It’s always a bad idea. They got caught, ”City Attorney Dennis Herrera said in a statement to The Chronicle. “Now they have to bring these buildings into compliance with the law – including fire safety and affordable housing requirements – and pay a high enough price for their misconduct. We’re going to make sure the playing field is level and breaking the law doesn’t pay.

The whitelist of violations would be funny, if it weren’t so deadly for the building’s predominantly Latinx tenants. “The developers did not include the below-market rate unit required by city law; kitchens and bathrooms were added without a permit; and the building did not have the second exit required for tenants in the event of a fire, ”as the Chronicle explains. “Instead of the high-quality facade pictured in the architect’s renderings, the building had small vinyl windows, inexpensive siding, and stucco that is already cracking.”

District Supervisor Hillary Ronen scheduled hearings and told The Chronicle: “Homeowners need to be held accountable in a meaningful way. She said the building had been problematic and problematic for years.

A neighborhood architect told the Chronicle more bluntly. “I saw him come up and I was like, ‘This shit is not what we were promised’,” he said.


Source link

Previous Health Care Transportation Services Next Big Thing Market |
Next Walmart, Ikea and Amazon have a nasty shipping problem

No Comment

Leave a reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *